In Table 1 as published, some of the data were wrong. The corrected Table 1 is shown here. In addition, according to the corrected Table 1, the sentence "the k /K of CsnA-CBM5 was higher than that of WT by 143%" in the part of "The kinetic parameters and specific activity" in the Results part should be changed to "the k /K of CsnA-CBM5 was higher than that of WT by 110%".
In Table 1 as published, some of the data were wrong. The corrected Table 1 is shown here. In addition, according to the corrected Table 1, the sentence "the k /K of CsnA-CBM5 was higher than that of WT by 143%" in the part of "The kinetic parameters and specific activity" in the Results part should be changed to "the k /K of CsnA-CBM5 was higher than that of WT by 110%".